[react-dom] Update types for latest state of Float

[eps1lon]

1. [Float][Fizz][Fiber] implement preconnect and prefetchDNS float methods facebook/react#26237
2. [Float][Flight][Fizz][Fiber] Implement preloadModule and preinitModule facebook/react#27220
3. [Float] support fetchpriority on ReactDOM.preload() and ReactDOM.preinit() facebook/react#26880
4. [Float] Nonce preload support facebook/react#26939
5. [Float][Fizz][Fiber] support imagesrcset and imagesizes for ReactDOM.preload() facebook/react#26940
6. Add referrerPolicy option to ReactDOM.preload() facebook/react#27096
7. Concrete string literal for crossOrigin

@gnoff Could you review this one?

[DangerBotOSS]

Inspecting the JavaScript source for this package found some properties that are not in the .d.ts files.
The check for missing properties isn't always right, so take this list as advice, not a requirement.

react-dom (unpkg)

was missing the following properties:

1. createRoot
2. hydrateRoot

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 20aff78

[typescript-bot]

@eps1lon Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

• react-dom — on npm, on unpkg (author is owner)

Code Reviews

Because this is a widely-used package, a DT maintainer will need to review it before it can be merged.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• 🕐 Most recent commit is approved by a DT maintainer

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.

---

Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 66896,
  "author": "eps1lon",
  "headCommitOid": "20aff78030b143e9bf74a3768b2e71044f1118ed",
  "mergeBaseOid": "98e68ce4add1e1fc4aad17402ae8eaab9ca15088",
  "lastPushDate": "2023-10-02T12:59:44.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2023-10-04T18:42:34.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Critical",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "react-dom",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/react-dom/canary.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/react-dom/test/canary-tests.tsx",
          "kind": "test"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "MartynasZilinskas",
        "theruther4d",
        "Jessidhia",
        "eps1lon"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Critical"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [
    {
      "type": "approved",
      "reviewer": "gnoff",
      "date": "2023-10-04T18:42:34.000Z",
      "isMaintainer": false
    },
    {
      "type": "stale",
      "reviewer": "rbuckton",
      "date": "2023-10-03T20:02:55.000Z",
      "abbrOid": "fd29081"
    }
  ],
  "mainBotCommentID": 1743031004,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

[typescript-bot]

🔔 @MartynasZilinskas @theruther4d @Jessidhia — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

[gnoff]

Internally we just treat this as a string argument now however what probably make sense in TS is to enumerate all of the known valid as types for preloads

// from: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes/rel/preload#what_types_of_content_can_be_preloaded

audio
document
embed
fetch
object
script
style
track
worker
video

[gnoff]

Suggested change

	integrity?: string | undefined;
	integrity?: string | undefined;
	nonce?: string | undefined;

[gnoff]

Suggested change

	integrity?: string | undefined;
	integrity?: string | undefined;
	nonce?: string | undefined;

[typescript-bot]

@eps1lon One or more reviewers has requested changes. Please address their comments. I'll be back once they sign off or you've pushed new commits. Thank you!

[typescript-bot]

@rbuckton Thank you for reviewing this PR! The author has pushed new commits since your last review. Could you take another look and submit a fresh review?