We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make a decision on the licensing of the document content.
I like to think ahead: if we spend time on good documents then I feel MIT is a bit too light.
Maybe do a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 ?
We could add non-commercial but since we're doing open source we should maybe stay idealistic and keep it a Free Culture licence.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No takers for this?
If not CC then at least Apache 2.0 since we take contributions. I'm pretty sure we'd do ourselves a disservice by sticking with MIT.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Make a decision on the licensing of the document content.
I like to think ahead: if we spend time on good documents then I feel MIT is a bit too light.
Maybe do a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 ?
We could add non-commercial but since we're doing open source we should maybe stay idealistic and keep it a Free Culture licence.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: