Add Quantum Infinity configurator

[slavoutich]

@AdriaanRol Please take a look.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3750

• 0 of 86 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 35.681%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
pycqed/measurement/openql_experiments/generate_qi_cfg.py	0	86	0.0%

Totals
Change from base Build 3663:	-0.05%
Covered Lines:	20287
Relevant Lines:	56856

---

💛 - Coveralls

[AdriaanRol]

LGTM! Feel free to merge

[slavoutich]

The following commands are defined now. Any opinion to adjust them?

    Declaring following assembler commands:
i {}
rot_m135_180 {}
rot_m124.2_180 {}
rot_m99_180 {}
rot_m82.8_180 {}
rot_m45_180 {}
rot_0_m90 {}
rot_0_m41.4 {}
rot_0_m14.4 {}
rot_0_14.4 {}
rot_0_90 {}
rot_0_120.6 {}
rot_0_180 {}
rot_90_m90 {}
rot_90_90 {}
rot_90_180 {}
    Declaring following gate decompositions:
('rx120.6 %0', ['rot_0_120.6 %0'])
('rxm41.4 %0', ['rot_0_m41.4 %0'])
('rxm14.4 %0', ['rot_0_m14.4 %0'])
('rx14.4 %0', ['rot_0_14.4 %0'])
('rxm90 %0', ['rot_0_m90 %0'])
('rx90 %0', ['rot_0_90 %0'])
('rx180 %0', ['rot_0_180 %0'])
('rym90 %0', ['rot_90_m90 %0'])
('ry90 %0', ['rot_90_90 %0'])
('ry180 %0', ['rot_90_180 %0'])
('rzm68.4 %0', ['rot_90_180 %0', 'rot_m124.2_180 %0'])
('rz14.4 %0', ['rot_90_180 %0', 'rot_m82.8_180 %0'])
('rzm18 %0', ['rot_90_180 %0', 'rot_m99_180 %0'])
('rzm90 %0', ['rot_90_180 %0', 'rot_m135_180 %0'])
('rz90 %0', ['rot_90_180 %0', 'rot_m45_180 %0'])
('rz180 %0', ['rot_90_180 %0', 'rot_0_180 %0'])
('x %0', ['rx180 %0'])
('y %0', ['ry180 %0'])
('roty90 %0', ['ry90 %0'])
('cnot %0,%1', ['ry90 %1', 'cz %0,%1', 'ry90 %1'])
('x180 %0', ['rx180 %0'])
('y180 %0', ['ry180 %0'])
('y90 %0', ['ry90 %0'])
('x90 %0', ['rx90 %0'])
('my90 %0', ['rym90 %0'])
('mx90 %0', ['rxm90 %0'])
('cl_0 %0', ['i %0'])
('cl_1 %0', ['ry90 %0', 'rx90 %0'])
('cl_2 %0', ['rxm90 %0', 'rym90 %0'])
('cl_3 %0', ['rx180 %0'])
('cl_4 %0', ['rym90 %0', 'rxm90 %0'])
('cl_5 %0', ['rx90 %0', 'rym90 %0'])
('cl_6 %0', ['ry180 %0'])
('cl_7 %0', ['rym90 %0', 'rx90 %0'])
('cl_8 %0', ['rx90 %0', 'ry90 %0'])
('cl_9 %0', ['rx180 %0', 'ry180 %0'])
('cl_10 %0', ['ry90 %0', 'rxm90 %0'])
('cl_11 %0', ['rxm90 %0', 'ry90 %0'])
('cl_12 %0', ['ry90 %0', 'rx180 %0'])
('cl_13 %0', ['rxm90 %0'])
('cl_14 %0', ['rx90 %0', 'rym90 %0', 'rxm90 %0'])
('cl_15 %0', ['rym90 %0'])
('cl_16 %0', ['rx90 %0'])
('cl_17 %0', ['rx90 %0', 'ry90 %0', 'rx90 %0'])
('cl_18 %0', ['rym90 %0', 'rx180 %0'])
('cl_19 %0', ['rx90 %0', 'ry180 %0'])
('cl_20 %0', ['rx90 %0', 'rym90 %0', 'rx90 %0'])
('cl_21 %0', ['ry90 %0'])
('cl_22 %0', ['rxm90 %0', 'ry180 %0'])
('cl_23 %0', ['rx90 %0', 'ry90 %0', 'rxm90 %0'])

[slavoutich]

@AdriaanRol Now QASM looks good and should work with OpenQL. If you review now, I will merge.