Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update llx_c_shipment_mode.sql #1769

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2014
Merged

Update llx_c_shipment_mode.sql #1769

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2014

Conversation

frederic34
Copy link
Contributor

Update GLS and Colissimo tracking url

Update GLS tracking url
@BebZ
Copy link

BebZ commented Jul 24, 2014

Hello Frederic,
Are you working on making an admin to tack and update status of boxes sent via carriers ?
I just ask, maybe it's something possible in Dolibarr...
My carrier is Exapaq (and it's really cheap)... do you want code to input tracking ?

@frederic34
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello BebZ
I'm just doing update of french examples. I'm working on something in relation with carriers but it's not ready (like selectbank but for shipment method)

@atm-maxime
Copy link
Member

If I may, I think carriers should be considered as suppliers. Having an option "carrier" yes/no on the supplier card will allow to define the carrier list to display.

@BebZ
Copy link

BebZ commented Jul 24, 2014

Oh, for such good ideas, you may ! off course Maxime :)
if the Third "carrier" is considered as a "supplier" as well

  • if we select it on the propal (as Frederic did today), order and invoice (soon maybe)...
    We should be able to request it via phpmyadmin
    and get a list of sub-contracted services to carriers,
    and then control this list with the detailled invoice of the supplier...
    ... then finally get exact cost of transports...
    ... or we must keep transport costs in the shipments module ?

@atm-maxime
Copy link
Member

My guess is that we must keep transportation costs as a service line in the documents.

Allowing to define the carrier on proposal, order and invoice seems to be a good thing to me. But should we keep it as a simple combo box on the document ? If we go on the solution to have carriers as suppliers card, I think we should use the "contact/address" tab to define the carrier. It's a contact with the specific role "Carrier". And this role can easily be added to the list of roles on proposal, order, ...

What do you think @frederic34, @eldy ?

@eldy
Copy link
Member

eldy commented Jul 26, 2014

My think. We must keep difference between "shipment mode" and "supplier" providing transport.
shipment mode is a way to ship (it may be UPS or FedEx but also "by email" or "take it yourself").
So we must keep dictionnary of shipment mode. What we can do is adding a field into thirdparty (for supplier that are "transporteur" to link/store the shipment mode they provide).

eldy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2014
Update llx_c_shipment_mode.sql
@eldy eldy merged commit c5b26fa into Dolibarr:develop Jul 26, 2014
@frederic34 frederic34 deleted the patch-4 branch July 26, 2014 15:27
marcosgdf added a commit to marcosgdf/dolibarr that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants