Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 8, 2018. It is now read-only.

Task<T> class Properties shouldn't require Async suffix #21

Closed
tristal opened this issue May 6, 2015 · 0 comments · Fixed by #22
Closed

Task<T> class Properties shouldn't require Async suffix #21

tristal opened this issue May 6, 2015 · 0 comments · Fixed by #22

Comments

@tristal
Copy link
Contributor

tristal commented May 6, 2015

UseAsyncSuffixAnalyzer enforces the Async suffix on property names. Is that something this rule should enforce -- it seems like that should be the exception to the rule?

Errors:

public class MyClass
{
    Task<string> MyString { get; set; }
}
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants