Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace custom MSBuild targets with improved documentation #1790

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2015
Merged

Replace custom MSBuild targets with improved documentation #1790

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2015

Conversation

sharwell
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1788

@sharwell sharwell added this to the 1.0.0 Beta 16 milestone Nov 18, 2015
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 79.41%

Merging #1790 into master will not affect coverage as of 12883d7

@@            master   #1790   diff @@
======================================
  Files          551     551       
  Stmts        33124   33124       
  Branches      9161    9161       
  Methods                          
======================================
- Hit          26306   26305     -1
- Partial       5331    5332     +1
  Missed        1487    1487

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 12883d7

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@vweijsters
Copy link
Contributor

👍 Looks good, time to get the release out 😄

sharwell added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2015
@sharwell
Merge pull request #1790 from sharwell/fix-1788
661522c 
Replace custom MSBuild targets with improved documentation
@sharwell sharwell merged commit 661522c into DotNetAnalyzers:master Nov 18, 2015
@sharwell sharwell deleted the fix-1788 branch November 18, 2015 21:09
This was referenced Nov 22, 2015
Closed
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@vweijsters vweijsters

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0.0 Beta 16
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@sharwell @codecov-io @vweijsters