Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix handling of <include> elements in documentation #1898

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2015

Conversation

sharwell
Copy link
Member

@sharwell sharwell commented Dec 4, 2015

This change only updates SA1604, SA1606, and SA1615 to properly handle
these comments.

Fixes #1603

@sharwell sharwell added this to the 1.0.0 RC 2 milestone Dec 4, 2015
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 79.38%

Merging #1898 into stabilization will not affect coverage as of efdfd3b

@@            stabilization   #1898   diff @@
=============================================
  Files                 558     559     +1
  Stmts               34852   35013   +161
  Branches             9657    9689    +32
  Methods                                 
=============================================
+ Hit                 27667   27794   +127
- Partial              5643    5656    +13
- Missed               1542    1563    +21

Review entire Coverage Diff as of efdfd3b

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

using TestHelper;
using Xunit;

/// <summary>
/// This class contains unit tests for <see cref="SA1604ElementDocumentationMustHaveSummary"/>.
/// </summary>
/// <include file='../../StyleCop.Analyzers.ruleset' path='/Class1/Foo/*'/>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this supposed to be here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not.

@pdelvo
Copy link
Member

pdelvo commented Dec 4, 2015

Otherwise 👍

This change only updates SA1604, SA1606, and SA1615 to properly handle
these comments.

Fixes DotNetAnalyzers#1603
@vweijsters
Copy link
Contributor

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants