Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix SA1515 handling of comment after pattern-matching case label #2461

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2017

Conversation

sharwell
Copy link
Member

@sharwell sharwell commented Jun 24, 2017

Fixes #2462.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 24, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #2461 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2461      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.28%   97.28%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         734      735       +1     
  Lines       94977    94995      +18     
  Branches     3470     3470              
==========================================
+ Hits        92396    92414      +18     
  Misses       1741     1741              
  Partials      840      840
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...Test.CSharp7/LayoutRules/SA1515CSharp7UnitTests.cs 100% <100%> (ø)
...A1515SingleLineCommentMustBePrecededByBlankLine.cs 95.65% <100%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 42ff24a...bd3dad5. Read the comment docs.

@AArnott
Copy link
Contributor

AArnott commented Jun 24, 2017

Fixes #2462

@sharwell sharwell merged commit 05d5907 into DotNetAnalyzers:master Jun 24, 2017
@sharwell sharwell deleted the sa1515-case-pattern branch June 24, 2017 02:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants