Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Table sorter support sortOrder parameter #1897

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 9, 2023

Conversation

shijiatongxue
Copy link
Collaborator

@shijiatongxue shijiatongxue commented Nov 7, 2023

中文模板 / Chinese Template

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Feature

PR description

表格支持传入 sortOrder,用于根据升序和降序修改 sorter 函数场景

Changelog

🇨🇳 Chinese

  • Feat: Table sorter 支持 sortOrder 参数

🇺🇸 English

  • Feat: Table sorter supports sortOrder parameter

Checklist

  • Test or no need
  • Document or no need
  • Changelog or no need

Other

  • Skip Changelog

Additional information

Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Nov 7, 2023

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit fd15c4f:

Sandbox Source
pr-story Configuration
Semi Design: Simple Story Configuration

Copy link

cypress bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Passing run #2021 ↗︎

0 228 10 0 Flakiness 0
⚠️ You've recorded test results over your free plan limit.
Upgrade your plan to view test results.

Details:

Merge fd15c4f into 54bd2d6...
Project: semi-design Commit: a233513c47 ℹ️
Status: Passed Duration: 10:28 💡
Started: Nov 7, 2023 6:56 AM Ended: Nov 7, 2023 7:06 AM

Review all test suite changes for PR #1897 ↗︎

@DaiQiangReal DaiQiangReal merged commit 6286728 into main Nov 9, 2023
8 of 9 checks passed
@DaiQiangReal DaiQiangReal deleted the feat/sorter-sortOrder branch November 9, 2023 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants