Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Reincorporate space parameter back into the transp_contribution_by_group function #197

Closed
kpalmqui opened this issue Dec 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Reincorporate space parameter back into the transp_contribution_by_group function #197

kpalmqui opened this issue Dec 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@kpalmqui
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
feature_space

Comments

@kpalmqui
Copy link
Member

kpalmqui commented Dec 5, 2018

This issue will re-incorporate the space parameters back into the resource partitioning code via transp_contribution_by_group.

As a result of re-incorporating space, the function needs to utilize total transpiration, rather than transpiration of individual plant functional types during resource partitioning.

Space, adjusts the balanace of resources that individual plant functional types can utilize and represents how quickly plant functional types can respond to and utilize available resources.
@kpalmqui kpalmqui self-assigned this Dec 5, 2018
@kpalmqui kpalmqui added this to the feature_space milestone Dec 5, 2018
kpalmqui added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2018
@kpalmqui
Incorporate space back into transp_contribution_by_group, addressing …
661feef 
…issue #197

- added the space parameter back to the resource partitioning code
- also adjust key parameters for big sagebrush for testing purposes
@chaukap
Copy link
Contributor

chaukap commented Dec 31, 2018

I opened a new issue #204 to address an improvement we can make to the code now that we are using space.
Other than that, I do not see any issues with the new implementation. Good work!

@kpalmqui
Copy link
Member Author

kpalmqui commented Feb 1, 2019

Resolved by 661feef

@kpalmqui kpalmqui closed this as completed Feb 1, 2019
@kpalmqui kpalmqui mentioned this issue Mar 1, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kpalmqui kpalmqui

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
feature_space
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kpalmqui @chaukap