New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CoreXY kinematics as used in Markforged machine. #226
Comments
Isn't that a variation of a Cartesian printer?
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:19:33 +0000 (UTC), leolongvu
<notifications@github.com> had a flock of green cheek conures squawk
out:
…Hello
Is it possible to add a support for the Markforged kinematics as described in the picture? I upgraded my printer to this type of kinematics because the planar belt path makes everthing a little bit tidier.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23338990/48513121-eadb4100-e852-11e8-88db-76c7d39b31c8.png)
--
Stephen
CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C. (Y/N)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
|
@StephenRC No this is a variation of the CoreXY kinematics, the only difference is that the Y axis is only driven by the Y motor. I am having a little bit of trouble building the firmware binary to test the kinematics code, will submit the new kinematics once I tested them out. |
One motor moves the Y. One Motor Moves the X. Just like a Cartesian.
The X just has a more complicated belt path.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:09:19 -0800, leolongvu
<notifications@github.com> had a flock of green cheek conures squawk
out:
…
@StephenRC No this is a variation of the CoreXY kinematics, the only difference is that the Y axis is only driven by the Y motor.
I am having a little bit of trouble building the firmware binary to test the kinematics code, will submit the new kinematics once I tested them out.
--
Stephen
CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C. (Y/N)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
|
I don't think that's quite true. If you hold X stepper still and move Y stepper, the X axis will still move, because the relative belt path lengths will change. X will have to move in some amount to compensate for this. |
@mveinot That's totally correct. By the way the reason I am not able to test the kinematics code is that there is some trouble with compiling the CoreNG project, specifically this error concerning the Wire arduino library: `Building file: ../cores/arduino/Print.cpp Building file: ../cores/arduino/Reset.cpp I am not entitly sure about the reason behind it, maybe the "make" command, maybe the Arduino itself. |
Dang, didn't see that the x and y move the head. The x has to move
whenever the y moves.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:56:18 -0800, Mark Veinot
<notifications@github.com> had a flock of green cheek conures squawk
out:
…I don't think that's quite true. If you hold X stepper still and move Y stepper, the X axis will still move, because the relative belt path lengths will change. X will have to move in some amount to compensate for this.
--
Stephen
CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C. (Y/N)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
|
I believe this is now possible using the Kinematics matrix in RRF from 2.03 and later: Please start a forum discussion if that is not the case. |
Feature/prism
Hello
Is it possible to add a support for the Markforged kinematics as described in the picture? I upgraded my printer to this type of kinematics because the planar belt path makes everthing a little bit tidier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: