Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Make fugage and rage optional #283

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

CM000n
Copy link
Collaborator

@CM000n CM000n commented Jan 9, 2024

Fix #280
It seems that some car models like the bz4x doesn't report any fugage and rage values for their remote status.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9895806) 72.47% compared to head (36c1574) 72.47%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #283   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.47%   72.47%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        1355     1355           
=======================================
  Hits          982      982           
  Misses        373      373           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 72.47% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@CM000n CM000n changed the title Fix: make 'fugage' and 'rage' optional Fix: make fugage and rage optional Jan 9, 2024
@CM000n CM000n changed the title Fix: make fugage and rage optional Fix: Make fugage and rage optional Jan 9, 2024
@CM000n CM000n merged commit 09b3af8 into master Jan 9, 2024
25 checks passed
@CM000n CM000n deleted the fix/make_fugage_and_rage_values_optional branch January 9, 2024 10:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

running simple_client_example.py gives an error
2 participants