Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unify with os-js? #143

Closed
grue-bleen opened this issue Apr 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

unify with os-js? #143

grue-bleen opened this issue Apr 23, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@grue-bleen
Copy link

grue-bleen commented Apr 23, 2022

love the work done here, and the user-experience of daedalOS is simply awesome.
however, i also love the work being done at OS.js, mainly the structure, application packaging, etc.
from a community perspective, wouldn't it be awesome if we could all work together and build the best of both worlds?

from a neutral community member's perspective (unaffiliated with either project at the moment), i would love to see daedalOS components and superior look-and-feel contributed into the OS.js structure and packaging model. that would make for one ass-kicking web-desktop architecture.

see also: os-js/OS.js#800

@grue-bleen grue-bleen changed the title unify ecosystems with os-js? unify with os-js? Apr 24, 2022
@DustinBrett
Copy link
Owner

Thanks! That's a cool idea indeed. OS.js was one of a few projects that inspired me early on in my work on my project.

I do indeed have a plan to make it easier to add 3rd party support to daedalOS, and it would be good if existing OS.js apps/packages had a way to run in daedalOS. Do you have any examples apps worth trying to port as a first attempt? Or any docs about their structure/package model?

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 25, 2022
@DustinBrett DustinBrett converted this issue into discussion #144 Apr 25, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants