You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
love the work done here, and the user-experience of daedalOS is simply awesome.
however, i also love the work being done at OS.js, mainly the structure, application packaging, etc.
from a community perspective, wouldn't it be awesome if we could all work together and build the best of both worlds?
from a neutral community member's perspective (unaffiliated with either project at the moment), i would love to see daedalOS components and superior look-and-feel contributed into the OS.js structure and packaging model. that would make for one ass-kicking web-desktop architecture.
Thanks! That's a cool idea indeed. OS.js was one of a few projects that inspired me early on in my work on my project.
I do indeed have a plan to make it easier to add 3rd party support to daedalOS, and it would be good if existing OS.js apps/packages had a way to run in daedalOS. Do you have any examples apps worth trying to port as a first attempt? Or any docs about their structure/package model?
Repository owner
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 25, 2022
love the work done here, and the user-experience of daedalOS is simply awesome.
however, i also love the work being done at OS.js, mainly the structure, application packaging, etc.
from a community perspective, wouldn't it be awesome if we could all work together and build the best of both worlds?
from a neutral community member's perspective (unaffiliated with either project at the moment), i would love to see daedalOS components and superior look-and-feel contributed into the OS.js structure and packaging model. that would make for one ass-kicking web-desktop architecture.
see also: os-js/OS.js#800
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: