Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unify with daedalOS? #800

Closed
grue-bleen opened this issue Apr 24, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

unify with daedalOS? #800

grue-bleen opened this issue Apr 24, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@grue-bleen
Copy link

love the work being done at OS.js, mainly the structure, application packaging, etc.
however, i also think the user-experience of daedalOS is simply awesome.
from a community perspective, wouldn't it be awesome if we could all work together and build the best of both worlds?

from a neutral community member's perspective (unaffiliated with either project at the moment), i would love to see daedalOS components and superior look-and-feel contributed into the OS.js structure and packaging model. that would make for one ass-kicking web-desktop architecture.

see also: DustinBrett/daedalOS#143

@grue-bleen grue-bleen changed the title unify ecosystems with daedalOS? unify with daedalOS? Apr 24, 2022
@andersevenrud
Copy link
Member

Glad to hear you like it!

This is doable (pretty much all functionality in the codebase is modular and can be swapped out), though it could mean a lot of work if the goal is to replace all of the user interfaces etc.

I don't use React or any other full blown library or framework here, so it's not possible just to swap out things on a component level.

If someone wants to take a stab at this, then please feel free to do so. I'm way to busy to be involved much in this, but I will happily answer any tickets or questions etc. that comes in.

@andersevenrud
Copy link
Member

Since this discussion was closed upstream, I'm doing the same because of inactivity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants