Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

i#6685 core-shard: Add idles and waits to basic_counts #6754

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

derekbruening
Copy link
Contributor

Adds counts of idle and wait records to basic_counts, which are useful when examining core-sharded-on-disk traces.

Rewords "scheduling markers" to "timestamp + cpuid markers" to clarify. Rewords "transfer markers" to "kernel transfer markers".

Updates the tests; the core-serial tests non-zero output here, and the core-sharded test also manually tested non-zero output as it required removing these counts for reliable comparison of record vs replay.

Issue: #6685

Adds counts of idle and wait records to basic_counts, which are useful
when examining core-sharded-on-disk traces.

Rewords "scheduling markers" to "timestamp + cpuid markers" to clarify.
Rewords "transfer markers" to "kernel transfer markers".

Updates the tests; the core-serial tests non-zero output here, and the
core-sharded test also manually tested non-zero output as it required
removing these counts for reliable comparison of record vs replay.

Issue: #6685
@derekbruening
Copy link
Contributor Author

Failure is record_filter_bycore_multi due to an inaccurate pi estimate print by the app on a64 sve: #6755

@derekbruening
Copy link
Contributor Author

(waiting on an issue with PR #6725 affecting our internal tests...will merge once that is resolved)

@derekbruening derekbruening merged commit 525020b into master Apr 5, 2024
16 checks passed
@derekbruening derekbruening deleted the i6685-idle-counts branch April 5, 2024 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants