New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add precision option for datetime string dumping #370
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ def process(value) | |
else | ||
@options[:store_as_string] | ||
end | ||
value = DateTime.iso8601(value).to_time.to_i if use_string_format | ||
value = DateTime.iso8601(value).to_time if use_string_format | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I believe it should be tested as well. It's a new feature - storing milliseconds when use string format for datetime. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I agree, I think this could be a clearer abstraction. FWIW, This was amended to make the current and additional spec coverage pass |
||
ApplicationTimeZone.at(value) | ||
end | ||
end | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
# frozen_string_literal: true | ||
|
||
module Dynamoid | ||
VERSION = '3.2.0' | ||
VERSION = '3.2.1' | ||
end |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ | |
Dynamoid.config.store_datetime_as_string = store_datetime_as_string | ||
end | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Excessive new lines detected |
||
it 'prioritize field option over global one' do | ||
store_datetime_as_string = Dynamoid.config.store_datetime_as_string | ||
Dynamoid.config.store_datetime_as_string = false | ||
|
@@ -366,6 +368,18 @@ | |
expect(raw_attributes(obj)[:signed_up_on]).to eql('2017-09-25') | ||
end | ||
|
||
it 'stores in string format with precision when :iso_precision is present' do | ||
klass = new_class do | ||
field :signed_up_on, :datetime, store_as_string: true, iso_precision: 6 | ||
end | ||
|
||
signed_up_on = DateTime.now.utc.iso8601(6) | ||
|
||
obj = klass.create(signed_up_on: signed_up_on) | ||
|
||
expect(reload(obj).signed_up_on.to_f).to eql(DateTime.iso8601(signed_up_on).to_f) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think i't completely OK to use The precision is 6 in the test so it's OK, but with precision 9 (with nanoseconds) this test could become flaky because MRI isn't accurate in preserving nanoseconds for Time/DateTime. |
||
end | ||
|
||
it 'stores in string format when global option :store_date_as_string is true' do | ||
klass = new_class do | ||
field :signed_up_on, :date | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need these changes in type casting. Anything that is like date/time could be casted to DateTime. Type casting isn't connected with writing/reading attributes to/from DynamoDB.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@andrykonchin Per the comment, the existing expected behaviour is to break for poorly parsed strings. https://github.com/Dynamoid/dynamoid/blob/master/spec/dynamoid/type_casting_spec.rb#L143
I wrote this work around to support precision, and also keep the same erroneous expectations. Parse is expected to throw an exception, where as constructing with iso8601 has less strict input expectations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Well.
Here.
DateTime.parse
supports precision, doesn't it?Here
completely ignores
ApplicationTimeZone.utc_offset
what's wrong. If passed string doesn't have timezone -ApplicationTimeZone.utc_offset
should be used as default timezone.I thinks precision support could be added directly in this line:
seconds argument could have fraction so this line could be changed in this way:
Look at the example: