Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2022. It is now read-only.

[EOSIOCPP] Clarify the Situation around eosio.wasmsdk #5040

Closed
3 of 6 tasks
ghost opened this issue Aug 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed
3 of 6 tasks

[EOSIOCPP] Clarify the Situation around eosio.wasmsdk #5040

ghost opened this issue Aug 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 4, 2018

Problem

Multiple users reported problems to get a simple contract compiled. (see the references to this issue)

Possible Cause

@larryk85 within #5015 (comment):

The new workflow moving forward is to use eosio.wasmsdk. This has the new compiler (toolchain), eosiolib and standard libs.

@wanderingbort within #5106 (comment)

We are no longer maintaining the eosio.system contracts or the eosiolib from this repository. We port over eosiolib changes to maintain parity while it is in deprecation but the official repository is : https://github.com/EOSIO/eosio.wasmsdk/

Once the base feature is added and released there, then the contracts repo can be upgraded to take advantage of it: https://github.com/EOSIO/eosio.contracts/

Solution

Suggestion

Such changes should not be done with without an RFC-Issue (Request for Comments from all interested parties, usually an [RFC] issue within the repo is enough). Sometimes the "annoying" folks has a point that you core-devs don't see.

More info within #5133

Sidenote

eosio.wasmsdk should possibly become eosio.sdk

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Aug 15, 2018

@taokayan , could you please add this to the 1.3 Milestone?

@halsaphi
Copy link
Contributor

halsaphi commented Nov 1, 2018

Please refer to latest eosio.cdt, code and documentation:
https://github.com/EOSIO
https://developers.eos.io/
If problem persists with latest version please raise new issue.

@halsaphi halsaphi closed this as completed Nov 1, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants