You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Turning on water isotopes shouldn't change answers for bulk water or any other non-water-isotope quantity. We should add a new system test to confirm this (similar in concept to the LVG test).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With the new cprnc, for this to pass, we'd need a namelist flag that turns off the water isotope diagnostic fields so that there are no differences in field lists.
Modularize snow cover fraction method
This tag moves the calculation of frac_sno - and the related updates of
snow_depth - into a new set of classes, with one class for each
parameterization (Niu & Yang 2007 and Swenson & Lawrence 2012).
Previously, the code always calculated frac_sno the new way, but then
possibly overwrote it if using the older Niu & Yang method. The new code
cleans this up, only doing the calculations that are needed for each
method.
In addition, other code that is specific to one of the two methods is
now moved to a home that makes this dependence on method explicit. This
includes the addition of newsnow to int_snow: previously, int_snow was
always updated using an equation specific to the newer CLM5
parameterization of frac_sno, which was not appropriate if using the Niu
& Yang parameterization; this doesn't make a difference currently, since
int_snow is only referenced if using the Swenson & Lawrence
parameterization, but this clears up some confusion. Also, time-constant
parameters read from namelist or the netCDF parameter file now reside in
the appropriate class rather than being more global.
This tag also renames two namelist options to increase clarity:
- subgridflag is renamed to use_subgrid_fluxes, and is now a logical
- oldfflag is renamed to snow_cover_fraction_method, and is now a string
Resolves#502Resolves#503Resolves#571
Turning on water isotopes shouldn't change answers for bulk water or any other non-water-isotope quantity. We should add a new system test to confirm this (similar in concept to the LVG test).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: