Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Part IV: Set up of an economic operator #202

Closed
ec-mcs opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Part IV: Set up of an economic operator #202

ec-mcs opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
V3.0.0 A solution for the issue is to be provided in version 3

Comments

@ec-mcs
Copy link
Collaborator

ec-mcs commented Nov 23, 2018

The ESPDint solution does not allow to enter a date for the EO when it was established. Is this a bug in the ESPD EDM?

@jerouris jerouris self-assigned this Nov 28, 2018
@jerouris
Copy link
Collaborator

Do you mean Part II? Where in Part IV there is a criterion about the setup of the EO?

@paulakeen paulakeen added the TBD Needs analysis and discussion with the requester and the rest of stakeholders label Nov 30, 2018
@paulakeen
Copy link
Collaborator

I do not understand this issue, MC. Can we discuss this asap.

@mireiaBM
Copy link

During the meeting with the MS held on September 10, 2019, it was decided that this issue requires a change of structure: removing the criterion and put it in as subcriterion of specific and generic turnover.
The change will be implemented in version 3.0.0.

@mireiaBM mireiaBM added V3.0.0 A solution for the issue is to be provided in version 3 and removed TBD Needs analysis and discussion with the requester and the rest of stakeholders labels Sep 12, 2019
@hricolor
Copy link
Collaborator

After the presentation of several proposed solutions to the OUC (Wednesday 17 of June), and the discussion over the topic, the agreement was to delete de Criterion No 33 and include the information about the set up of the economic operator as subcriteria of the generic and specific turnover criteria.

This issue will be fixed in the new version of ESPD.

@hricolor
Copy link
Collaborator

After the presentation of several proposed solutions to the OUC (Wednesday 17 of June), and the discussion over the topic, the agreement was to delete de Criterion No 33 and include the information about the set up of the economic operator as subcriteria of the generic and specific turnover criteria.

This issue will be fixed in the new version of ESPD.

As commented in the previous contribution. It was applied in the last ESPD release 3.0.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
V3.0.0 A solution for the issue is to be provided in version 3
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants