Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RESTRICTED_ACCELERATED code as an Extension of Procedure class in UBL 2.3 #260

Closed
hricolor opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
TBD Needs analysis and discussion with the requester and the rest of stakeholders

Comments

@hricolor
Copy link
Collaborator

Different elements that nowadays are represented as codes in the ProcedureType CL are not actually procedures. For those cases, which are Legal Basis, Legal Regimes or Attributes, ESPD could analyse the extension of the class "procedure" (in UBL 2.3) to refer to these elements without using them as Codes per se.

This issue is specifically for the analysis of "RESTRICTED_ACCELERATED" and how it could be applied to ensure its correct usage. The proposal would be to extend the class "Procedure", where the code refers to using the new version of UBL 2.3.

@hricolor hricolor added the TBD Needs analysis and discussion with the requester and the rest of stakeholders label Mar 30, 2020
@hricolor
Copy link
Collaborator Author

After the analysis and discussion on the topic, it has been concluded the next release of ESPD will not include information regarding the procedure, but only Exclusion and Selection grounds. The information referencing the procedure will come from eForms. Therefore, as eForms has already extended the XSD to meet its business requirements, there is no need to extend the ESPD schema. This would create an extra complexity, and it does not make sense to extend an international standard if it could create complexity.

Therefore, we proceed to close the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
TBD Needs analysis and discussion with the requester and the rest of stakeholders
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant