-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for Django 3.1.x? #90
Comments
Really want to move to 3.1.x |
@hannylicious Please report any (not already reported) issues found when using the latest commit in master here (which should support the basics of 3.1) |
The error i am getting is When trying to query on boolean fields such as The is_active field is a boolean and the sql being generated is not valid. It generates SQL saying |
I will need a more complete example to debug this |
Somethings that are not supported at the moment, example with the addition of collations, most recent release versions will not be able to dbinspect as introspection will be needed. I will submit a formal issue. |
I am also getting similar error after update to django 3.1 seems like it is incompatible with django_q and some other packages steps to produce error:
I am in bad need of updating to 3.1... request you to provide ETA for 3.1... |
@rmControls Does the master branch work for you? To learn how to install from a git repo please see: https://pip.pypa.io/en/stable/reference/pip_install/#vcs-support |
Looks good... checked with django q module and seems like it it working.... I will check the other packages and report errors if I find it.... thanks for the quick solution.... |
I'm still struggling with a similar error as others in this thread regarding moving to 3.1 - this same error occurs across a few applications here and there for us. This was what we saw doing a regular
Same application works fine with Django 3.0.x, so we're staying there for now - but we're approaching end of life with Django 3.0.x so we'd like to migrate... Any thoughts on when full 3.1.x support might be ready? Additional Information ('master branch fix'): I've installed from the 'master branch', and while that appears (at least locally) to have eliminated some of the immediate SQL issues which prevented it from working in some apps - others are still running into SQL issues. I'm not sure installing from from master branch is a real good solution for those of us relying on using |
Please, I have same issue. How to fix it? |
Any update on this bug? Anything we need to provide that can help getting it fixed/ included in pip install? |
@lukesavvatiller I fear this repo has gone or is going in the same direction as the original one that this was forked off of. |
The MS open source project which is a fork from this one will release the patch this month. |
@jwaschkau excellent! I know myself and others have been waiting anxiously for a Microsoft supported version of this driver to be out! I'm glad @OskarPersson picked up the old project and created this one to get us to this point! I appreciate that work, for sure. |
En mi caso pasé mucho tiempo intentando, estoy con Django 3.2. Me funcionó hacerlo con el paquete mssql. |
Hi! Any updates on this? I'm having the same problem as below. I've updated django up to 3.2.1 where boolean issues are quoted on bug fixes but the problem persist. Tks for helping
|
Pypi mentions django-mssql-backend supporting up to Django 3.0. For later versions you could try to use a fork of this package named mssql-django (https://github.com/microsoft/mssql-django) |
Just writing to see if there are plans for supporting Django 3.1.x
We were considering moving - but when we attempted to do so we ran into a lot of MSSQL errors (varying in degree and varying across applications).
Downgrading to 3.0.x fixes all issues. Just curious if there is a timeline for 3.1.x versions? I checked online but couldn't find any mention of it anywhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: