fix(catalog): Support multi-level group & high-level withdrawn control anchor links

[Bronstrom]

This PR supports anchor links for multiple-levels of control groups.

Testing

Navigate to the Catalog Viewer and reload the following catalog(s):

• https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EasyDynamics/oscal-demo-content/brad/test-catalog-multi-layered-groups/catalogs/multi_layered_group_test_catalog.json. Test out any of multi-level catalog groupings.
• https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EasyDynamics/oscal-demo-content/test-content/catalogs/basic-test-catalog.json. Test out "Test Group E" and ensure the anchor links open, scroll, and navigate properly.

Relates to #176

[tuckerzp]

Is there sample data or a test to ensure this works? I remember some talk on this being tricky, but this also seems like something we'd prefer to not just trust it works.

At the very least discussion on why this can't be done would be good here. In the past, we have made dummy data to at least show a feature works even if we don't push it to our actual sample data.

[tuckerzp]

I think some changes in your previous pr to groups may have broken how we handle groups within groups.

Replication

https://oscal-viewer.msd.easydynamics.com/catalog/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EasyDynamics/oscal-demo-content/test-content/catalogs/basic-test-catalog.json

1. Go to Test Group E
2. Click on Test Group E.1

[Bronstrom]

Doing some additional testing on this issue, I believe this is now in proper working order to fully support multi-level groups.

I think some changes in your previous pr to groups may have broken how we handle groups within groups.

Yes, when ensuring that a group.title is used when group.id isn't present I missed one place, and it would cause the application to fail right away when no group.id is provided by the first highest-level group. I've corrected this.

https://oscal-viewer.msd.easydynamics.com/catalog/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EasyDynamics/oscal-demo-content/test-content/catalogs/basic-test-catalog.json

Hey, this is actually a pretty good example to test multi-layered groups. Thanks for sharing this! I'll go ahead and place it in the description under "Testing".

[Bronstrom]

I've tried to stress test these groups and they seem to be working as intended. I also noticed that high-level withdrawn controls had some state issues in a similar vein, so I've made a fix to them as well.

Please refer to the test data provided above, when testing.

[kylelaker]

I also noticed that high-level withdrawn controls had some state issues in a similar vein, so I've made a fix to them as well

Are you talking about #743 or another issue?

[Bronstrom]

Are you talking about #743 or another issue?

It's related to handling anchor link navigation for withdrawn controls. It's unrelated to opening a withdrawn control.

[tuckerzp]

@Bronstrom I really appreacite all your hard work! These are some fairly complex changes, so my comments are mostly just about clarity. I think a bit of jsdoc and renaming could make things a bit easier to understand here.