docs(contributing): Merge #5816 with #5752 Indonesian translation #6719
Conversation
Vía EbookFoundation#6590 Vía EbookFoundation#5762 Recovered from PR EbookFoundation#5752 requested by @reskimulud Co-authored-by: Reski Mulud Muchamad <63949402+reski-mulud-muchamad@users.noreply.github.com>
davorpa
added
🐛 BUG
davorpa
changed the title
- Format using fenced style. - Well indent in those placed inside list enumerations. - Simulate `Good` - `Bad` monospace double colon indent inside each one. - Examples highlighting as `text-plain`. The `md, markdown` style doesn't work very well since blocks has mixed syntax. - `check_urls` code block highlighted as `properties` style (key-value pair). Solves markdownlint rules: - MD040/fenced-code-language: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified - MD046/code-block-style: Code block style [Expected: indented; Actual: fenced]
…orconfig param Solves markdownlint rules: MD004/ul-style: Unordered list style "consistent"
…a name="...">` is used near to each of those list items
specially ones about Guidelines and Formatting
It apply the hack to highlight in IDE/Editors those headings with an anchor alias just before itself
- `et al.` - File extensions `.md` - Protocols: `http`, `https`... - Notes: LeanPub, require email, StackOverflow, in process, archived trailing dots in that lines
…ting/merge-5752-and-5816 SHA: 7a8349a
Co-authored-by: ImVector <59611597+LuigiImVector@users.noreply.github.com>
|
what does |
See cd517c1 commit. It's a kind of makeup that hacks syntax highlight in IDE/Editors when HTML and Markdown is mixed to give precedence to this latest. An example is worth a thousand words: It's ok? |
|
isn't "name" deprecated for |
Only in HTML5, and the W3C says "obsolete": https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#obsolete-but-conforming-features. Anyway it works anyway If change needs be addopted, |
|
What more we need to go ahead with this PR? |
What does this PR do?
Improve repo
For resources
Description
Recover missing parts from translation from PR #5752 requested by @reskimulud
Why is this valuable (or not)?
Checklist:
Follow-up