Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Schema: readme: pattern to simplify recursive schema definition #2420

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2024
Merged

Schema: readme: pattern to simplify recursive schema definition #2420

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

gcanti
Copy link
Contributor

@gcanti gcanti commented Mar 26, 2024

No description provided.

@gcanti gcanti added the schema label Mar 26, 2024
@changeset-bot changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 26, 2024 •
edited

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 0a8c894

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@gcanti gcanti merged commit 9b664a7 into main Mar 27, 2024
12 checks passed
@gcanti gcanti deleted the chore/schema-recursive-pattern branch March 27, 2024 06:44
tim-smart pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2024
@gcanti @tim-smart
Schema: readme: pattern to simplify recursive schema definition (#2420)
b5b44a6
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
schema
Projects
PR Backlog
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
1 participant
@gcanti