We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From serverpe...@gmail.com on June 12, 2012 16:24:29
Current version of AccessClassLoader.get(Class):
static AccessClassLoader get (Class type) { ClassLoader parent = type.getClassLoader(); for (int i = 0, n = accessClassLoaders.size(); i < n; i++) { AccessClassLoader accessClassLoader = accessClassLoaders.get(i); if (accessClassLoader.getParent() == parent) return accessClassLoader; } return new AccessClassLoader(parent); }
I think it shoud be something like this (and synchronized or double-checked with volatile):
static synchronized AccessClassLoader get (Class type) { ClassLoader parent = type.getClassLoader(); for (int i = 0, n = accessClassLoaders.size(); i < n; i++) { AccessClassLoader accessClassLoader = accessClassLoaders.get(i); if (accessClassLoader.getParent() == parent) return accessClassLoader; } AccessClassLoader newClassLoader = new AccessClassLoader(parent); accessClassLoaders.add(newClassLoader); return newClassLoader; }
Regards
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/reflectasm/issues/detail?id=6
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From nathan.s...@gmail.com on June 13, 2012 04:07:30
Good find, thanks!
Status: Fixed
Sorry, something went wrong.
From nathan.s...@gmail.com on June 13, 2012 04:07:34
This issue was closed by revision r31.
No branches or pull requests
From serverpe...@gmail.com on June 12, 2012 16:24:29
Current version of AccessClassLoader.get(Class):
I think it shoud be something like this (and synchronized or double-checked with volatile):
Regards
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/reflectasm/issues/detail?id=6
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: