Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AccessClassLoader.accessClassLoaders list is never added to #6

Closed
ghost opened this issue Nov 12, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

AccessClassLoader.accessClassLoaders list is never added to #6

ghost opened this issue Nov 12, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 12, 2013

From serverpe...@gmail.com on June 12, 2012 16:24:29

Current version of AccessClassLoader.get(Class):

static AccessClassLoader get (Class type) {
    ClassLoader parent = type.getClassLoader();
    for (int i = 0, n = accessClassLoaders.size(); i < n; i++) {
        AccessClassLoader accessClassLoader = accessClassLoaders.get(i);
        if (accessClassLoader.getParent() == parent) return accessClassLoader;
    }
    return new AccessClassLoader(parent);
}

I think it shoud be something like this (and synchronized or double-checked with volatile):

static synchronized AccessClassLoader get (Class type) {
    ClassLoader parent = type.getClassLoader();
    for (int i = 0, n = accessClassLoaders.size(); i < n; i++) {
        AccessClassLoader accessClassLoader = accessClassLoaders.get(i);
        if (accessClassLoader.getParent() == parent) return accessClassLoader;
    }
    AccessClassLoader newClassLoader = new AccessClassLoader(parent);
    accessClassLoaders.add(newClassLoader);
    return newClassLoader;
}

Regards

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/reflectasm/issues/detail?id=6

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 12, 2013

From nathan.s...@gmail.com on June 13, 2012 04:07:30

Good find, thanks!

Status: Fixed

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 12, 2013

From nathan.s...@gmail.com on June 13, 2012 04:07:34

This issue was closed by revision r31.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Nov 12, 2013
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants