Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only set RUSTFLAGS for coverage #1370

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024
Merged

Only set RUSTFLAGS for coverage #1370

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

sveitser
Copy link
Collaborator

@sveitser sveitser commented Apr 23, 2024

Currently the coverage workflow is broken because we set RUSTFLAGS globally that only work with nightly.

@sveitser sveitser requested a review from tbro April 23, 2024 15:17
@sveitser
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sveitser sveitser marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2024 16:00
@sveitser sveitser enabled auto-merge (squash) April 23, 2024 16:00
Copy link
Contributor

@tbro tbro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coverage passes so it should be good. I don't understand why only setting vars for coverage fixes coverage? Or were they being overridden for coverage since they were set globally?

@sveitser sveitser merged commit c0726f4 into main Apr 23, 2024
15 checks passed
@sveitser sveitser deleted the ma/fix-coverage-ci-ng branch April 23, 2024 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants