Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi Select Menu #46

Closed
kumarGayu opened this issue Jun 6, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Multi Select Menu #46

kumarGayu opened this issue Jun 6, 2019 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kumarGayu
Copy link
Contributor

kumarGayu commented Jun 6, 2019

Screen Shot 2019-05-28 at 12 41 49 PM
Screen Shot 2019-05-28 at 12 41 23 PM

cc: @asangma @patrickarlt
I can start looking at development based existing design. may be we can enhance when we have better design.

This is required for chart authoring experience and designed by Mike Stinson.

@kumarGayu kumarGayu self-assigned this Jun 6, 2019
@babakbolour
Copy link

you are all aware of the pluralization issue with this, right? best way to implement this is:
"Fields selected: 3"

@macandcheese
Copy link
Contributor

macandcheese commented Jun 6, 2019

This is similar to filter dropdown (https://github.com/ArcGIS/calcite-components/projects/2#card-22328663, http://esri.github.io/calcite-web/documentation/patterns/#filter-dropdown), which is in Wishlist for now because I think there are a ton of variants across apps of "something like this" that should share underlying components... input fields, chips (https://material.io/design/components/chips.html), dropdowns, etc.,

I think it's all part of a story that needs more design consideration to make sure all possible variants look the same - simple multi-select like this, typeahead from an input multi-select, etc.

@asangma
Copy link
Contributor

asangma commented Jun 7, 2019

Can this include search? 👁 👁

@macandcheese
Copy link
Contributor

I'd imagine we would want to replicate "filtering" a pre-determined list like we do here: http://esri.github.io/calcite-web/documentation/patterns/#filter-dropdown

For search, hopefully it could be extended by the consumer to look the same to an end user, but we probably don't want to handle any backend searches. Maybe "app-components" could contain more advanced functionality while sharing styles and appearance.

I will make an issue for filter chips that could support icon, "close", etc., since that seems like a re-usable component for a few larger patterns.

@asangma
Copy link
Contributor

asangma commented Jun 18, 2019

@macandcheese Yo...sorry for the communication gap.
And yeah, I meant more client-side filtering than search.
For the purposes of browsing a list and selecting one/many items to populate an input for a configuration panel, the text filtering should be enough.

@patrickarlt
Copy link
Contributor

Closing to track in #61.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants