Remove Force option #2442
Merged
Remove Force option #2442
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pgermishuys
added
the
area/documentation
pgermishuys
requested review from
thefringeninja,
hayley-jean,
shaan1337 and
jageall
hayley-jean
previously approved these changes
Apr 21, 2020
jageall
suggested changes
Apr 21, 2020
pgermishuys
force-pushed
the
remove-force
branch
from
31ea92a
to
fbdabdc
Compare
hayley-jean
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2020
thefringeninja
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2020
jageall
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removed: Force option
Related to reviewing options in #2114
This option was used initially used to be able to force Event Store to run on unsupported versions of the Mono runtime or an unsupported GC such as boehm. This is no longer the case since Event Store has moved to .NET Core. The only other place this option is used is to force the use of a directory that starts with a
~which we don't expand.Do we want to keep this option around for future use or remove it?