Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] show full schema on request #1868

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

samster25
Copy link
Member

@samster25 samster25 commented Feb 12, 2024

image

@samster25 samster25 changed the title show full schema on request [FEAT] show full schema on request Feb 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (05e3e3f) 85.41% compared to head (b16a5cb) 85.48%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1868      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.41%   85.48%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        6190     6192       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         5287     5293       +6     
+ Misses        903      899       -4     
Files Coverage Δ
daft/logical/schema.py 91.37% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
daft/viz/dataframe_display.py 93.18% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

@samster25 samster25 merged commit 4caeed4 into main Feb 12, 2024
42 checks passed
@samster25 samster25 deleted the sammy/show-full-schema-on-request branch February 12, 2024 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Better repr for schema
2 participants