Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please officially release 2.0 and update docs #76

Open
galtenberg opened this issue Sep 4, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Please officially release 2.0 and update docs #76

galtenberg opened this issue Sep 4, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@galtenberg
Copy link

I am burning a lot of time working through inconsistencies in http://dev.evernote.com/doc/reference against 2.0.1-beta (eg, I'm still not able to get note content with NoteStore.getNoteWithResultSpec, not sure where to go next).

Would deeply appreciate an official release. Thank you!!

@julen
Copy link
Contributor

julen commented Oct 27, 2017

Hi @galtenberg, I'm sorry to hear about all the trouble and thanks for the heads up for the next release. I cannot give you any ETA but I think we would be able to release 2.0 and update the relevant docs once #71 has been addressed.

@bkniffler
Copy link

Is this going to happen any time? I'm experiencing the same, I've been loosing a lot of time with evernote SDK, there is much trial and error and uncomprehensive errors. For example https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50735758/js-sdk-thrift-error-code-12-when-getting-sharednotebookslist (same thing as in example https://github.com/evernote/evernote-sdk-js#notestore-for-linked-notebooks).

@julen
Copy link
Contributor

julen commented Aug 15, 2018

Hi @bkniffler, I sympathize with your frustration and while I'm not an authoritative voice here, as I heard it's likely the SDK will get an update soon — at least the parts that are auto-generated from Thrift definitions, which are currently very outdated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants