Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2024-06-05] [$250] Merge account - Email for merged account is prefixed with 0@ in archived workspace chat #40977

Open
6 tasks done
kbecciv opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 38 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Weekly KSv2

Comments

@kbecciv
Copy link

kbecciv commented Apr 25, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.65-5
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. [Admin] Invite User A and B to the workspace.
  3. [Admin] Remove User A from the workspace.
  4. [User B] Go to Old Dot.
  5. [User B] Merge account with User A.
  6. [User B] Return to New Dot.
  7. [User B] Open workspace chat with User A (after merging).

Expected Result:

User A email will be displayed correctly in the archived workspace chat.

Actual Result:

User A email is prefixed with 0@ in the archived workspace chat.

Workaround:

n/a

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6461468_1714043719861.bandicam_2024-04-25_19-08-56-249.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01e83a7aa224f88987
  • Upwork Job ID: 1785403324396785664
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-05-14
  • Automatic offers:
    • getusha | Reviewer | 0
Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @sakluger / @trjExpensify
@kbecciv kbecciv added Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Apr 25, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 25, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @sakluger (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@kbecciv
Copy link
Author

kbecciv commented Apr 25, 2024

We think that this bug might be related to #vip-vsb

@kbecciv
Copy link
Author

kbecciv commented Apr 25, 2024

@sakluger FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Apr 29, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 30, 2024

@sakluger Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this?

@sakluger
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder if we're looking for the account ID instead of the account email. When merging accounts, both accounts end up under a single account ID. That means that if you try referencing the account ID for the account that was merged into the current one, you won't find it.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Apr 30, 2024
@sakluger sakluger added External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Overdue labels Apr 30, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Merge account - Email for merged account is prefixed with 0@ in archived workspace chat [$250] Merge account - Email for merged account is prefixed with 0@ in archived workspace chat Apr 30, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01e83a7aa224f88987

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Apr 30, 2024
@sakluger sakluger removed Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors Overdue labels Apr 30, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @getusha (External)

@sakluger sakluger added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Apr 30, 2024
@sakluger
Copy link
Contributor

sakluger commented May 2, 2024

Waiting for proposals.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label May 6, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 7, 2024

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented May 7, 2024

Waiting for proposals.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label May 7, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 9, 2024

@sakluger @getusha this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to approving a proposal? If not, what's blocking us from getting this issue assigned? Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label May 9, 2024
@sakluger
Copy link
Contributor

Still waiting for proposals.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Overdue and removed Overdue labels May 10, 2024
@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented May 21, 2024

@rezkiy37's proposal works well and looks good to me
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ Reviewed!

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 21, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @srikarparsi, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

@srikarparsi srikarparsi assigned rezkiy37 and unassigned rezkiy37 May 21, 2024
@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 is from Callstack, could you ping @getusha and myself once the PR is ready :)

@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor

Sure! I am opening a PR today.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels May 21, 2024
@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor

The PR has been opened.
cc @srikarparsi @getusha

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels May 29, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$250] Merge account - Email for merged account is prefixed with 0@ in archived workspace chat [HOLD for payment 2024-06-05] [$250] Merge account - Email for merged account is prefixed with 0@ in archived workspace chat May 29, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 29, 2024

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label May 29, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 29, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.76-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-06-05. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 29, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@getusha] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@getusha] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@getusha] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@getusha] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@getusha] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@sakluger / @trjExpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Jun 4, 2024
@sakluger
Copy link
Contributor

sakluger commented Jun 5, 2024

@trjExpensify thanks for helping while I was out! I'm back and have unassigned you.

@getusha could you please complete the BZ checklist and accept the Upwork offer?

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Jun 5, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  1. Check if policy room is archived because of merging #14779
  2. Check if policy room is archived because of merging #14779 (comment) commented by other c+ from similar issue
  3. N/a
  4. Yes, the steps written on the issue description looks good.

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Jun 5, 2024

@sakluger could we hold the payment here? i am working on moving payments to ND

@sakluger
Copy link
Contributor

sakluger commented Jun 5, 2024

@getusha is that being tracked anywhere? Do you know how much longer until you are moved to NewDot payments?

@sakluger
Copy link
Contributor

sakluger commented Jun 5, 2024

Thanks for linking! I'm going to set this issue as a weekly. Could you please leave a comment here when you're ready to accept payment via NewDot?

@sakluger sakluger added Weekly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Weekly KSv2
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants