Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove hyphens, brackets from phone number #8845

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 9, 2022
Merged

remove hyphens, brackets from phone number #8845

merged 6 commits into from
May 9, 2022

Conversation

thesahindia
Copy link
Member

@thesahindia thesahindia commented May 1, 2022

Details

At phone number field on company step and additional details page we couldn't add hyphens, brackets and +1 this PR deals with that. We are stripping hyphens, brackets and +1 from the phone number.

Fixed Issues

$ #7007

Tests | QA Steps

Note: You will need to test it on Desktop and Native

Routing no. 011401533
Account no. 1111222233331111

  1. Navigate to workspace > Connect bank Account > Connect manually > Fill the details give above and save
  2. Verify you see (xxx)xxx-xxxx as the placeholder in phone number field
  3. Enter phone number in the company phone number field with different formats (345)562-2345, 345-562-2345
  4. Submit the form and verify you don't see any error for phone number
  5. Go back and add +1 in the starting of the phone number and try submitting the form
  6. Verify you aren't getting any error for phone number

  1. Click on Fab icon > send money > onfido verification > Additional details page
  2. Verify you see (xxx)xxx-xxxx as the placeholder in phone number field
  3. Enter phone number in the phone field with different formats e.g. (345)562-2345, 345-562-2345
  4. Submit the form and verify you don't see any error for phone number
  5. Go back and add +1 in the starting of the phone number and try submitting the form
  6. Verify you aren't getting any error for phone number

  1. Click on Fab icon > send money > onfido verification > Additional details page
  2. Leave the phone number field empty and try to submit the form
  3. Verify you are seeing an error message below the phone number field

  1. Go to setting > Profile > Add phone number
  2. Add only 3-4 digits in the phone number field > add your password > Press "Send validation" button
  3. Verify that the error message says Please enter a valid phone number, with the country code (e.g. +1234567890)

  1. Go to login page
  2. Add only 3-4 digits in "Phone or email" field > Press the "Continue" button
  3. Verify that the error message says Please enter a valid phone number, with the country code (e.g. +1234567890)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Review Checklist

Contributor (PR Author) Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there’s a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained “why” the code was doing something instead of only explaining “what” the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named “index.js”. All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • Any functional components have the displayName property
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose and it is
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn’t already exist
    • The style can’t be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.

PR Reviewer Checklist

  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there’s a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained “why” the code was doing something instead of only explaining “what” the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named “index.js”. All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • Any functional components have the displayName property
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn’t already exist
    • The style can’t be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.

Screenshots

Can't test Web and mWeb because of CORS error

Desktop

Screen.Recording.2022-05-02.at.1.57.14.AM.mov

iOS

Screen.Recording.2022-01-20.at.4.11.46.AM.mov

Android

Screen.Recording.2022-01-20.at.3.57.42.AM.mov

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code is looking fine. Please add detailed QA steps to cover each change in this PR.

@thesahindia
Copy link
Member Author

The code is looking fine. Please add detailed QA steps to cover each change in this PR.

Done ✅

parasharrajat
parasharrajat previously approved these changes May 5, 2022
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Can't test it on the Web | mWeb.

cc: @marcaaron

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@marcaaron marcaaron requested review from neil-marcellini and removed request for marcaaron May 6, 2022 19:49
@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

👀 reviewing now

Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good to go except for 1 confusing comment. Then I will approve!

src/libs/ValidationUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Neil Marcellini <neil@expensify.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to go!

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini merged commit 51fb618 into Expensify:main May 9, 2022
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 9, 2022

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @neil-marcellini in version: 1.1.58-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by @AndrewGable in version: 1.1.60-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants