HoTT Telemetry: robustness measure #2631
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Marked draft while waiting for more external test results |
mha1
force-pushed
the
PR_HoTT_Telemetry_robustness_measure
branch
from
75aee19
to
9919eaa
Compare
pkendall64
reviewed
Apr 3, 2024
pkendall64
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2024
JyeSmith
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Got user feedback about 33601 Vario and S8361 80V voltage module not working. Both modules use very slow Microchip PIC processors without hardware UART meaning even slower software serial implementation. They just aren't fast enough to read serial data sent back to back. A small delay of net 500us between polling byte 1 and 2 makes polling more robust.
Tested on ER6 with 33601 and also a variety of other sensors for regression testing.