Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make ADIOS tests compatible with 2.9 and 2.10 #3128

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

jhale
Copy link
Member

@jhale jhale commented Apr 15, 2024

We know we are not compatible with 2.10. Will do a minor DOLFINx release once ADIOS 2.10 is widely available.

We know we are not compatible and will do a minor DOLFINx release once ADIOS 2.10 is widely available.
@jorgensd
Copy link
Sponsor Member

We know we are not compatible with 2.10. Will do a minor DOLFINx release once ADIOS 2.10 is widely available.

I'll add a try except in the test, give me a few minutes to build adios 2.10 locally to make a fix

@jorgensd
Copy link
Sponsor Member

@jhale I added a patch to the test. As the only thing that doesn't work with adios2 is the test, i think it is better to patch the test for backwards compatibility than restricting build versions

@garth-wells
Copy link
Member

Why not apply fixes to be compatible with 2.10? How much work would it be?

@jorgensd
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Why not apply fixes to be compatible with 2.10? How much work would it be?

Ive changed the scope of the PR. We are now compatible with 3.10, given that try except clause in the adios tests (only Python interface changed from 2.9 to 2.10).

@jorgensd jorgensd changed the title Upper bound on ADIOS2 version Make ADIOS tests compatible with 2.9 and 2.10 Apr 15, 2024
@jhale
Copy link
Member Author

jhale commented Apr 15, 2024

Looks good

@garth-wells garth-wells added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 31d4a32 Apr 15, 2024
21 checks passed
@garth-wells garth-wells deleted the jhale/adios2-version-upper-bound branch April 15, 2024 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants