Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ICON-D2 for more precise 48h forecasts #10

Open
an0nfunc opened this issue Jul 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

ICON-D2 for more precise 48h forecasts #10

an0nfunc opened this issue Jul 8, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@an0nfunc
Copy link

an0nfunc commented Jul 8, 2023

I was wondering if it would be possible to add support for ICON-D2.

It seems to provide significantly more accurate data (thanks to higher resolutions it seems) than the "normal" ICON model.

Since it's in grib2 format, it would probably require a different method of parsing.

DWD Documentation of ICON-D2 (Section 6.3. Near surface products)
DWD OpenData Folder for ICON-D2 (the subfolders are different generation times if I understand correctly)

Also this data would need to be merged with the normal ICON (or ICON-EU, see below) model for >45h forecast.

I would be happy to help, but I thought getting an overview first (and your opinion on this) would probably help.

If you want to see it in action, windy has this model included.

EDIT: After some further reading, the normal station data seems to depend on the ICON 13km resolution. Seeing this, it would probably also help to switch to ICON-EU for the 45h+ forecast.

Resolutions
ICON: 13km
ICON-EU: 6.5km
ICON-D2: 2.2km

Motivation: ICON data differs significantly where I live (in the 5° range temperature wise, precipitation is even worse), so getting more accurate forecast (into hass) is always helpful.

@FL550
Copy link
Owner

FL550 commented Aug 25, 2023

Sorry for the late reply, I have overlooked your message.

Yes, I agree with you. This would be a nice addition! Unfortunately I currently don't have time implementing this. So it will take a few more weeks before this could happen.

Best regards

@an0nfunc
Copy link
Author

an0nfunc commented Aug 25, 2023

Would you be willing to accept a PR? I already got a PoC running.

@FL550
Copy link
Owner

FL550 commented Aug 25, 2023

Of course I would!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants