Digest unparcellated_regions from map specs #435
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Although some regions are defined in a map configuration with indices (for accuracy), they do not correspond to any regions in the corresponding region. (see https://github.com/FZJ-INM1-BDA/siibra-python/actions/runs/5740796548/job/15559446484?pr=373)
For example, on fsaverage space Julich brain 3 have indices for the following regions but they are not part of the Julich brain 3 region tree.
This PR allows digesting fields such as one above from map configurations and when a use ones to get the region object for their corresponding index, it informs the users and returns None (the same action for when there are not matches).
Also, it allows the
parcellationmap.Map.get_colormap
method to skip such regions. (While they might have a color value, the colors are currently defined in parcellation configurations.)