You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we assert calls on property accessors, the descriptions are inconsistent between the asserted calls and the list of actual calls made to the fake.
Currently we have this for the asserted calls:
getter: IFoo.get_Bar()
setter: IFoo.set_Bar(value: 42) (*)
But in the list of actual calls, we have this:
getter: IFoo.Bar
setter: IFoo.Bar = 42
Which I think is better. Anyway, we should probably make the descriptions consistent with each other.
(*) That's a lie. In fact we have Castle.Proxies.ObjectProxy_12 instead of IFoo, but it's another issue (#1298)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When we assert calls on property accessors, the descriptions are inconsistent between the asserted calls and the list of actual calls made to the fake.
Currently we have this for the asserted calls:
IFoo.get_Bar()
IFoo.set_Bar(value: 42)
(*)But in the list of actual calls, we have this:
IFoo.Bar
IFoo.Bar = 42
Which I think is better. Anyway, we should probably make the descriptions consistent with each other.
(*) That's a lie. In fact we have
Castle.Proxies.ObjectProxy_12
instead ofIFoo
, but it's another issue (#1298)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: