-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Overloads of GetStringAsync #526
Comments
Hi there and welcome to this repository! A maintainer will be with you shortly, but first and foremost I would like to thank you for taking the time to report this issue. Quality is of the highest priority for us, and we would never release anything with known defects. We aim to do our best but unfortunately you are here because you encountered something we didn't expect. Lets see if we can figure out what went wrong and provide a remedy for it. |
I can look into what it would take to implement these overloads, but I cannot start until next week. I'll get back to you when I know more. |
Hi @mungojam. When retrospecting regarding what I've been up to this year I unfortunately have to tell you that my engagements with my day-to-day employer has ramped up in intensity. I will still be able to keep my projects up-to-date regarding security issues and external dependencies due to automation, but even though I would love to implement this feature, because I think it's a good one that will increase the value of this project, I cannot give you a deadline, nor promise you that I ever will find the time to implement it. Looking at alternatives, are you able to contribute the code to this project? Or are you working for a company that is making money and have the option to fund this project? |
A new version has now been released. Thank you for the contributions! |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The
GetStringAsync()
extension on HttpClient is exactly what I need, but it's not currently supported with this (super) packageDescribe the solution you'd like
I'd like it to work just like the other overloads, taking the AWS credentials as a parameter
Describe alternatives you've considered
I can call
GetAsync()
instead but then I need to work a bit harder with the response status codes etc.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: