Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vulnerability reported in version 4.2.1 #22

Closed
anttiSalmivaara opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Vulnerability reported in version 4.2.1 #22

anttiSalmivaara opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@anttiSalmivaara
Copy link

NVD check reports CVE-2022-40152 found in stax2-api version 4.2.1

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

But isn't that against Woodstox? Stax2-api has no dependency on Woodstox: Woodstox implements stax2-api, not the other way around.

So I don't see how this could be accurate.

@jpoikela
Copy link

owasp check gives this now:

Warning:  

One or more dependencies were identified with known vulnerabilities in NNNN:

stax2-api-4.2.1.jar (pkg:maven/org.codehaus.woodstox/stax2-api@4.2.1, cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:woodstox:4.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) : CVE-2022-40152

See the dependency-check report for more details.

and mvn repository also points here
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.codehaus.woodstox/stax2-api/4.2.1

can you @cowtowncoder confirm that this information is inaccurate

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

cowtowncoder commented Feb 13, 2023

@jpoikela Yes, this is inaccurate. Someone should actually point out WHAT SPECIFICALLY is supposed to be the problem with stax2-api. But there seem to be severe issues with many of these submissions with bad metadata, incorrect applicability etc.

I think whoever added applicability did not really know what they were doing. :-(

(Tekisi melkein mieli ehdottaa että "taas joku saatanan tunari asialla" mutta ehkäpä on jotain lieventäviä asianhaaroja :) )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants