Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stax API should be provided instead of required #2

Closed
guidomedina opened this issue Sep 12, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Stax API should be provided instead of required #2

guidomedina opened this issue Sep 12, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@guidomedina
Copy link

Stax API at the pom.xml should be provided instead of required, same as you did for StAxMate I think. Most people are using Java 6+ at this moment.

@guidomedina
Copy link
Author

This isn't really a bug, I just want to avoid doing this:

        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.codehaus.woodstox</groupId>
            <artifactId>woodstox-core-asl</artifactId>
            <version>4.4.1</version>
            <exclusions>
                <exclusion>
                    <groupId>javax.xml.stream</groupId>
                    <artifactId>stax-api</artifactId>
                </exclusion>
            </exclusions>
        </dependency>

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Agreed, yes. And baseline for Woodstox 5.0 will be JDK 6 anyway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants