-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for autonomous transactions [CORE1409] #1827
Comments
Modified by: @asfernandesassignee: Adriano dos Santos Fernandes [ asfernandes ] |
Commented by: Roman Rokytskyy (rrokytskyy) Please provide exact description of what the autonomous transactions are. We had already the case where autonomous transactions where just another name to savepoints, which are fully supported by Firebird. |
Commented by: @asfernandes Autonomous transaction is when a procedure or trigger run in another (self open and close) transaction. |
Commented by: @asfernandes Syntax: IN AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION DO <statement> Example: IN AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION DO |
Modified by: @asfernandesstatus: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ] resolution: Fixed [ 1 ] Fix Version: 2.5 Alpha 1 [ 10224 ] |
Modified by: @pcisarWorkflow: jira [ 12780 ] => Firebird [ 14876 ] |
Commented by: Jonas Jasas (jon) This feature would be great, and useful! Hope it will be implemented one day. |
Commented by: @dyemanov The ticket is resolved as you could see, so it is already implemented :-) |
Commented by: Alexander Tyutik (tut) Is it possible to set transaction parameters for autonomous transactions? |
Commented by: @asfernandes In the moment, no. The new transaction starts with the same isolation level of the existing one. |
Modified by: @asfernandesWiki Page: http://wiki.firebirdsql.org/wiki/index.php?page=IN+AUTONOMOUS+TRANSACTION |
Commented by: Sascha Michel (datiscum1) OK to set Transaction parameters makes sense ! I have the following problem: Using an ReadOnly Transaction for long outstanding commit When we can say Or is that conncept og long outstanding ReadOnly transactions obsolete ? |
Modified by: @pmakowskistatus: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ] |
Submitted by: Igor Lobov (ivl)
Is related to QA302
Votes: 1
To add support of autonomous transactions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: