How about rewriting @?

[littleggghost]

Hi, @FlorianWilk
You did a really awesome job! I can't believe that you can model a Spot-like robot and get an nice achievement in control!
There maybe has a "problem": It would be better if this code could support python2.7 and python3 simultaneously. But the grammar "@" in kinematics.py seems not supported in py2.7 which just means matrix multiplication. So, maybe replace the "@" by normal grammar is better? Or wait for my PR?

Best Regards!

[FlorianWilk]

Hi littleeggghost, thanks a lot for the nice mail. Yes, you're right about the @-Issue. I am using Python3 since i also use it in my Jupyter-Notebooks, but yes, i will think about rewriting it to make it work with P2.7, too. Did the rest work for you? This Project is still at the very beginning so expect a lot of bugs :) Regards, Florian

…

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 8:52 AM littleggghost ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, @FlorianWilk <https://github.com/FlorianWilk> You did a really awesome job! I can't believe that you can model a Spot-like robot and get an nice achievement in control! There maybe has a "problem": It would be better if this code could support python2.7 and python3 simultaneously. But the grammar "@" in kinematics.py seems not supported in py2.7. So, maybe replace the "@" by normal grammar is better? Best Regards! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA26L7S3QNK4OMTQRAO65ITPXOAJLA5CNFSM4HPZCKY2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4GV6Q6NQ>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA26L7TOPO7PXFP4Q2JYTMTPXOAJLANCNFSM4HPZCKYQ> .

[littleggghost]

Thanks for your reply!
I will commit a PR to make it compatible with py2.7.