Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swiping in monthly view is a pain #153

Open
7 tasks done
topcaser opened this issue Feb 17, 2024 · 6 comments
Open
7 tasks done

Swiping in monthly view is a pain #153

topcaser opened this issue Feb 17, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
bug Something is not working

Comments

@topcaser
Copy link

Checklist

  • I can reproduce the bug with the latest version given here.
  • I made sure that there are no existing issues - open or closed - to which I could contribute my information.
  • I made sure that there are no existing discussions - open or closed - to which I could contribute my information.
  • I have read the FAQs inside the app (Menu -> About -> FAQs) and my problem isn't listed.
  • I have taken the time to fill in all the required details. I understand that the bug report will be dismissed otherwise.
  • This issue contains only one bug.
  • I have read and understood the contribution guidelines.

Affected app version

1.0.2

Affected Android/Custom ROM version

Android 14

Affected device model

Pixel 8 pro

How did you install the app?

GitHub releases

Steps to reproduce the bug

  1. Open monthly view
  2. Swipe right or left to the next month
  3. It snaps back to the currently displayed month in 8 of 10 cases (unlike swiping through the weekly view)

Expected behavior

Swiping through months is similar like swiping through weekly view

Actual behavior

Snaps back most of the time

Screenshots/Screen recordings

No response

Additional information

No response

@topcaser topcaser added bug Something is not working needs triage Issue is not yet ready for PR authors to take up labels Feb 17, 2024
@Aga-C
Copy link
Member

Aga-C commented Feb 17, 2024

Do you have CalDAV sync enabled with pull-to-refresh from the top?

@Aga-C Aga-C added question Further information is requested waiting for author If the author does not respond, the issue will be closed. Otherwise, the label will be removed. labels Feb 17, 2024
@topcaser
Copy link
Author

Yes, I have. You are right. If I deactive the manual refresh, than it's working fine. Thanks for pointing that out

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the waiting for author If the author does not respond, the issue will be closed. Otherwise, the label will be removed. label Feb 17, 2024
@Aga-C Aga-C removed question Further information is requested needs triage Issue is not yet ready for PR authors to take up labels Feb 17, 2024
@tramsauer
Copy link

tramsauer commented May 14, 2024

Thank you all for this very nice app!! 🙏

Same issue here. 'Solved' by deactivating manual refresh. But, manual refresh would be nice to have.

Can the direction/ angle threshold be changed? A very minimal shift in downwards direction already triggers refreshing (red arrow in image). The blue arrow indicates what could be a middleground.
ResizedImage_2024-05-14_08-11-00_1802

@Roy-Orbison
Copy link

Roy-Orbison commented Aug 30, 2024

Disabling a useful feature isn't really a solution. Original bug from a year ago.

The physical workaround for this is to leave pull-to-refresh enabled but swipe slightly upwards as you go from side to side, like the hour hand of 🕤 or 🕝.

@Aga-C
Copy link
Member

Aga-C commented Aug 30, 2024

@Roy-Orbison Nobody wants to disable it, the bug is accepted and ready for anyone to fix. Also, it's not Simple Mobile Tools anymore, no need to reference it.

@Roy-Orbison
Copy link

The two previous commenters mention "solving" it by disabling pull-to-refresh. I'm aware of the fork, that doesn't change the fact it was a pre-existing issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something is not working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants