You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is the idea that this wouldn't be order preserving? Or it would only order preserving if you knew that all of plan a's ordering keys were less than plan b's ordering keys, so you could safely concatenate plan a and then plan b?
When implementing a union that's guaranteed to be non-overlapping, the planner could create a concatenation plan that would execute more efficiently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: