Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RecordQueryConcatenationPlan for non-overlapping unions #13

Open
nschiefer opened this issue Sep 7, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Add RecordQueryConcatenationPlan for non-overlapping unions #13

nschiefer opened this issue Sep 7, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@nschiefer
Copy link
Contributor

When implementing a union that's guaranteed to be non-overlapping, the planner could create a concatenation plan that would execute more efficiently.

@alecgrieser
Copy link
Contributor

Is the idea that this wouldn't be order preserving? Or it would only order preserving if you knew that all of plan a's ordering keys were less than plan b's ordering keys, so you could safely concatenate plan a and then plan b?

@nschiefer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was imagining the latter. It's a bit niche, but there was a motivating use case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants