New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Index.predicate as an index maintenance filter when appropriate #2069
Comments
jjezra
added a commit
to jjezra/fdb-record-layer
that referenced
this issue
Mar 23, 2023
…e filter when appropriate
jjezra
added a commit
to jjezra/fdb-record-layer
that referenced
this issue
Apr 14, 2023
…e filter when appropriate
jjezra
added a commit
to jjezra/fdb-record-layer
that referenced
this issue
May 3, 2023
…e filter when appropriate Apply Index Predicate in addition to the index maintenance. (Squashed commits)
jjezra
added a commit
to jjezra/fdb-record-layer
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2023
…e filter when appropriate - javadoc fix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
FDBRecodStore is currently using a predefined
IndexMaintenanceFilter
as filter (defaulted to IndexMaintenanceFilter.NORMAL).With the new
Index.predicate
field, change the logic to be:If the user had explicitly set his own IndexMaintenanceFilter, use it.
Else if the index predicate was defined, use it.
Else use IndexMaintenanceFilter.NORMAL.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: