New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MAIN ISSUE] Materials Functionality is inconsistent and inflexible #10174
Comments
CC @davesrocketshop (just linking you to ticket 😉 ) |
1st PR submitted. From the pull request: NOTE: This PR introduces a new dependency on yaml-cpp (https://github.com/jbeder/yaml-cpp). This is available through First PR for Issue #10174 - the Materials system update.
|
Dave did a good breakdown of the work that needs to be done. I'm reproducing it here. A lot of these topics are already individual issues or should become issues at the right time but let's not swamp the tracker just yet.
Material libraries API Material arrays Materials Editor Materials diff viewer Embedded Materials Physical Materials Appearance Materials Apperance Preview Arch migration |
New PR #11138. Primarily editor enhancements to support arrays, but also improvements to the material save workflow. Numerous minor improvements |
Is there an existing issue for this?
Full version info
Subproject(s) affected?
None
Problem description
this is a placeholder issue.
Materials is a broad requirement in many different workbenches. A more robust and integrated capability is needed that supports existing tools and allows us to develop more advanced features in the future.
Context:
https://forum.freecad.org/viewtopic.php?t=16714&sid=3ee17d7b50064496fa66255f0a46672c
https://ondsel.com/blog/freecad-needs-a-better-materials-system
https://forum.freecad.org/viewtopic.php?style=4&p=685834#p685834
Anything else?
No response
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: