Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[0.19] [Path] Add UseOutline feature to Adaptive op [1 of 3 per dev conversation] #4384

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 14, 2021

Conversation

Russ4262
Copy link
Contributor

@Russ4262 Russ4262 commented Feb 7, 2021

This PR isolates the addition of the UseOutline feature to the Adaptive operation at found in PR #4324 . The feature is cloned from PocketShape.

I recommend consideration of PR #4345 as a possible chaser. It adds a simple Adaptive test framework to the Path workbench test suite and is already coded for testing this UseOutline feature.

Thank you for creating a pull request to contribute to FreeCAD! To ease integration, please confirm the following:

  • Branch rebased on latest master git pull --rebase upstream master
  • Unit tests confirmed to pass by running ./bin/FreeCAD --run-test 0
  • Commit message is well-written
  • Commit message includes issue #<id> or fixes #<id> where <id> is the associated MantisBT issue id if one exists

And please remember to update the Wiki with the features added or changed once this PR is merged.
Note: If you don't have wiki access, then please mention your contribution on the 0.19 Changelog Forum Thread.


@sliptonic sliptonic changed the title [Path] Add UseOutline feature to Adaptive op [1 of 3 per dev conversation] [0.19] [Path] Add UseOutline feature to Adaptive op [1 of 3 per dev conversation] Feb 8, 2021
@sliptonic sliptonic merged commit 02b3074 into FreeCAD:master Feb 14, 2021
@Russ4262 Russ4262 deleted the feature_useoutline_to_adaptive branch February 17, 2021 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants