Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[winpr,sysinfo] add additional neon check #9748

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

akallabeth
Copy link
Member

systems not explicitly handled in IsProcessorFeaturePresent now enable NEON intrinsics if __ARM_NEON is defined.
Fixes #9746

@akallabeth akallabeth added this to the next-3.0 milestone Jan 9, 2024
@freerdp-bot
Copy link

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://ci.freerdp.com//job/PullRequestTester/11147/

@akallabeth akallabeth force-pushed the neon_enable branch 4 times, most recently from 00ed260 to d05a844 Compare January 9, 2024 09:03
systems not explicitly handled in IsProcessorFeaturePresent now enable
NEON intrinsics if __ARM_NEON is defined.
Fixes FreeRDP#9746
@freerdp-bot
Copy link

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://ci.freerdp.com//job/PullRequestTester/11149/

@akallabeth
Copy link
Member Author

@freerdp-bot test

@freerdp-bot
Copy link

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://ci.freerdp.com//job/PullRequestTester/11152/

@mfleisz mfleisz merged commit 78cdb55 into FreeRDP:master Jan 10, 2024
3 checks passed
@akallabeth akallabeth deleted the neon_enable branch January 10, 2024 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use NEON instruction on all platforms
3 participants