fix build with openssl < 1.1.1

[amazingfate]

I'm building freerdp 3.2.0 on ubuntu xenial with openssl 1.1.0g, and find some openssl vars/funcs are introduced after 1.1.1:

• RSA_get0_d, RSA_get0_e and RSA_get0_n are introduced by commit openssl/openssl@6692ff7 in which OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER is 0x10101007L: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/6692ff7777ea3e75f964de7ee64761ec8565f9be/include/openssl/opensslv.h#L42
• SSL_OP_NO_RENEGOTIATION is introduced by commit openssl/openssl@db0f35d in which OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER is 0x10101000L: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/db0f35dda18403accabe98e7780f3dfc516f49de/include/openssl/opensslv.h#L42
• EVP_sha512_224() and EVP_sha512_256() are introduced by commit openssl/openssl@4bed94f in which OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER is 0x10101000L: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/4bed94f0c11ef63587c6b2edb03c3c438e221604/include/openssl/opensslv.h#L42

This commit will fix build error with openssl 1.1.0g.

[freerdp-bot]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[github-actions]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

[akallabeth]

LGTM,
but you most likely mean build with openssl < 1.1.1?

[akallabeth]

@freerdp-bot test

[amazingfate]

LGTM, but you most likely mean build with openssl < 1.1.1?

Yeah, should I change the commit message to fix build with openssl < 1.1.1?

[freerdp-bot]

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://ci.freerdp.com//job/PullRequestTester/11514/

[akallabeth]

LGTM, but you most likely mean build with openssl < 1.1.1?

Yeah, should I change the commit message to fix build with openssl < 1.1.1?

please do so.

[github-actions]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

[akallabeth]

@freerdp-bot test

[freerdp-bot]

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://ci.freerdp.com//job/PullRequestTester/11515/