feat: automate Typedoc link regeneration in API docs #1180
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 8 commits
August 8, 2023 15:43
…/feat/implement-type-doc-in-program-package
Coverage report
Test suite run success1139 tests passing in 197 suites. Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from cbb929f |
Base automatically changed from
db/feat/implement-type-doc-in-program-package
to
master
August 11, 2023 11:25
…/feat/automate-typedoc-link-regeneration
danielbate
requested review from
digorithm,
arboleya,
camsjams,
Torres-ssf,
Dhaiwat10 and
nedsalk
as code owners
Torres-ssf
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2023
arboleya
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently the typedoc postbuild script uses hardcoded strings for link regeneration, this will rebuild them based off the filesystem.
Another requirement for the typedoc implementation in #835